When It Rains, It Snowdens

Will Mitt Run Again Or Just His Money Offshore?

Turning Turtle in Tortola, BVI:

The View From The Virgin Islands

 

By John McCarthy

Moderate Voice Columnist

 

Mitt Romney made offshore tax havens like the Cayman Islands household words.

But even Willard might blush at how much money the BVI took in last year.

That’s right, while I was eating cheese and bread, my neighbors 40 miles to the north were raking in $92 billion in 2013.

That’s more than Brazil and India combined, but less than the United States, China and Russia did individually.

In fact, little old Road Town, Tortola, where the fresh smell of the Caribbean Sea is around every corner – lost the bronze to Russia by only $2 billion – making them a close fourth in “foreign direct investment” worldwide.

In case you’re wondering, Brazil brought in $63 billion and India netted $28 billion. The world’s biggest economy, the United States, took in $159 billion last year, while China took in $127 billion and Russia got $94 billion.

The BVI government says its country is not a tax dodger’s paradise. But with 500,000 shell companies established just last year, the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) said it discovered “clear evidence of financial fraud” in 2,500 documents it examined.

At least 60 percent of the British Virgin Islands’ revenues come from offshore account fees, so there is little wonder why that Caribbean dependency is seeking to crack down on journalists who publish leaked confidential financial information.

Shell company registrations fell by 23 percent in the final quarter of 2013 after the ICIJ made its disclosure. Le Monde newspaper reported earlier this year that the BVI was concerned it would lose its confidential clients to Hong Kong and Singapore.

 Now that a bill has passed the BVI’s House of Assembly mandating that people who leak or share the names of secret investors face a sentence of 20 years in prison and a $1 million fine – it only needs the signatue of British-appointed Governor Boyd McCleary to become law.

This Freedom FROM Information Act from a country that only made incest a crime in the 1980s – and is now proposing to make child pornography illegal in this The Year of Our Zombie Apocalypse – 2014.

The United Nations and the Group of 20 Leading Economies (G20) say they want to put pressure on “non-cooperative jurisdictions” like the British Virgin Islands and Cayman Islands because they say such notorious tax havens have sucked an estimated $20 trillion out of the world economy.

The lack of transparency in Tortola made it easier for jailed fraudster Achilleas Kallakis to pull off the biggest mortgage con in history – worth an estimated $750 million. Kallakis used BVI shell companies to hide his fraud from lax British and Irish banks.

The BVI government’s clients also include Scot Young, a London property magnate and “fixer” for deceased oligarch Boris Berezovsky. Dundee-born Young is in jail for contempt of court for concealing assets from his ex-wife.Young’s lawyer, to whom he signed over power of attorney, appears to control interests in a Road Town company that owns a potentially lucrative Moscow development with a value estimated at $100 million.

India, Pakistan, Iran, China, Thailand and former communist states are also in the running in the BVI shell game lottery. The Cayman and Cook Islands are represented in the 2,500 documents, but most of the offshore accounts are in Road Town, Tortola, BVI.

Since the 1980’s, the BVI has attracted more than one million offshore entities. Here is a brief list of the main offenders:

• Denise Eisenberg-Rich of the United States, the former wife of commodities trader Marc Rich, who was controversially pardoned by President Clinton on tax evasion charges. Eisenberg-Rich put $144M into the Dry Trust, formed in the Cook Islands.

• Dictator’s daughter Maria Imelda Marcos Manotoc, a provincial governor in the Phillippines, is the eldest daughter of former President Ferdinand Marcos, known for deep pockets of corruption.

• A senator’s husband in Canada. Anthony “Tony” Merchant, a Saskatchewan lawyer, deposited more than $800,000 into an offshore trust. Merchant paid fees in cash and demanded that written communication to be “kept to a minimum.”

• Jean-Jacques Augier of France was Francois Hollande’s 2012 election campaign co-treasurer. Augier set up a Cayman Islands-based distributor in Beijing with a 25 percent partner in a BVI company. He says his partner is Xi Shu, a Chinese businessman.

• Spain’s wealthiest art collector, Baroness Carmen Thyssen-Bornemisza, a former beauty queen and widow of a Spanish steel billionaire. The Baroness uses offshore accounts to buy paintings and avoid a VAT.

• The wife of Russia’s deputy prime minister. Olga Shuvalova. Her husband Igor Shuvalov has denied charges of wrongdoing about her offshore accounts.

• Mongolia’s former finance minister, Bayartsogt Sangajav established “Legend Plus Capital, Ltd” with a Swiss bank account while he served as finance minister from 2008 to 2012. Sangajav says he goofed in not declaring the money and says he is considering “resigning” from his position in the 19^th largest country in the world.

• The president of Azerbaijan and his family. A local construction magnate, Hassan Gozal, launched paper entities in the names of President Ilham Aliyev’s two daughters.

The result of the BVI’s boom in offshore accounts is that the government there has sported an upscale “glass elevator” for several years so that visitors and officials alike can travel indoors in style. It has been the source of envy for U.S. Virgin Islands legislators for donkey years.

Although it has been known for decades that the BVI provides safe harbor for the “ethically challenged” investment community, the Financial Secretary in Tortola, Mr. Neil Smith, denies wrongdoing on the part of the government.

“Our legislation provides a more hostile environment for illegality than most jurisdictions,” Smith said.

Meanwhile the British Foreign Office is able to subsidize the costs of running an empire based on its cut of the $92 billion Tortola took in. Lawyers and accountants based in London also heavily benefit from these offshore accounts when they act as intermediaries.

Tortola means “land of the turtle dove” and certainly most contributors were safe and sound when the ICIJ looked under the turtle’s shell.

Secretary Smith promises that the BVI will act “swiftly and decisively” if any of “legitimately private” companies are implicated in illegal activity.

In the meantime, if Mitt really is running again in 2016 as Bob Schieffer first reported, he might be wise to move his money from the Cayman Islands to the British Virgin Islands.

Maybe by then Tortola will have turned completely turtle – locked up all the journalists who sought to expose corruption – and made the only money there that is visible the bills that drop into the ocean at the Soggy Dollar Bar.

 

© 2014 John Francis McCarthy/Secret Goldfish Publishing House, LLC

 John McCarthy is an investigative reporter, artist and photojournalist based in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Please send questions and comments to: johnfmccarthy807@msn.com

Under A Blood Red Sky

THE WORLD IS YOURS, KIDS!

COOKIE MONSTERS EAT BISCUITS NOW

THE VIEW FROM THE VIRGIN ISLANDS

 

By John McCarthy

The Moderate Voice

     On the eve of the blood moon, 31-year-old Steffen Lange was arrested for distributing neo-Nazi leaflets in a Brandenburg school.

     Easily not the first time a far-right activist in Germany has tried to recruit youngsters to the racist cause.

     But what made Lange different was that he was dressed as the Cookie Monster – from Sesame Street – not Sesamstrasse.

     Police arrested Lange because it is illegal to belong to a neo-Nazi organization there. A search of his Senftenberg apartment showed that he was also in possession of neo-Nazi paraphernalia that was propagandistic rather than historical – also a violation of German law.

     Computers in the Lange residence had photoshopped the image of the Cookie Monster with Adolf Hitler and admirers Forrest Gump-like under the caption: “Who ate my biscuit?”

     British newspapers speculated that the answer might be “immigrants,” like the swarthy Turks who come to Germany seeking a better way of life through menial labor.

     A German police spokesman described the use of the Cookie Monster’s image as an attempt to make neo-Nazism seem “harmless and everyday and perhaps something a bit fun and a bit rebellious.”

     News photos showed neo-Nazis on a German street dressed in blue Cookie Monster suits and red Tickle Me Elmo suits handing out racist pamphlets to children.

     Meanwhile, on Easter Sunday in Henrico County, VA – not far from the state capital of Richmond – some American racists had pre-loaded plastic eggs with racist propaganda messages.

     Brandon and Jackie Smith were supervising an egg hunt with their three-year-old when they saw that some of the eggs were different than the ones they had placed near their suburban Virginia property.

     “My husband noticed the last Easter egg and I knew it wasn’t one that we put out. We opened it and it’s got the white supremacist stuff in it,” Mrs. Smith told the local ABC affiliate.

     Inside the eggs were small papers with slogans like: “Diversity = white genocide” and “Mass immigration and forced assimilation of non-whites into our lands is genocide” messages that had been shared in the social media by participants of a poorly-attended “White Man March.”

     The Nazis prized youth participation in political activity from a tender age. Hitler Youth organizations actually existed prior to Adolf Hitler assuming power in Nazi Germany.

     The question becomes why? The NSDAP wanted children to get military-style training in weapons and assault tactics from an early age – and keep them out of church and Bible groups that they thought distracted from their message of German uber-nationalism.

     One such girls group of the Hitler Youth had a yearbook entitled: “Jungen eure Welt” which loosely translated means: “It’s Your World, Kids!” An important message for budding Nazis to learn – especially in the wake of what’s happened in the Ukraine – instructing future Nazis that international borders are mere arbitrary lines on a map – that can be erased with a simple blitzkrieg of tanks – or as in Putin’s case – by feint of force.

    If you want to set the bar on your beer hall putsch high – telling children that the world is theirs to conquer and giving them pre-training in specific arms and marine reconnaissance is a good start. The template the neo-Nazis are using now is nothing new.

     Children get used to a fat white man with a big white beard and a red suit who promises presents in Wintertime, so the fact that brown shirts and brown pants have been traded for one-piece blue furry suits is not really a stretch. But if the Nazi-expropriated Nietzschean blond beast had the fair hair and blue eyes of a “pure Aryan” – it is difficult to see how a cloth puppet with an insatiable desire for pastries figures into their fascist plans.

     What is different is what is the same. Because in America racism has gone troll-stealth on the Internet and in private groups: in Europe the underground is composed of skinheads disguised by costume. Whereas in the 1960’s the underground were easily identified by their Bohemian long hair and beards – now the clean-cut kid sitting next to you could be a dangerous neo-Nazi.

     It’s not exactly “The Boys From Brazil,” where a fictional Ira Levin account of a surviving Dr. Josef Mengele sought to clone Hitler and recreate his life experience among 94 Stepford sons in nine different countries – even down to the age difference between Adolf’s mother and father (23 years) and the exact age his father died when he was growing up in Austria (13 years old).

     But it is something to keep an eye on. Stuttgart mayor Manfred Rommel, former German foreign minister Hans-Dietrich, philosopher Jurgen Habermas, the late Prince Consort of the Netherlands Claus von Amsberg and Joseph Aloisius Ratzinger (aka Pope Benedict XVI) were all members of the Hitler Youth – and they turned out OK – after Nazism was rejected.

     If your idea of conquering the world by stealth involves using six-foot-tall skinheads dressed in clown costume on a public street – you might want to think again.

     Although propaganda and show of force makes for a powerful one-two punch – be careful if you do it – you might just end up being hoisted by your own Putin-petard.

     Which if you know your Shakespeare means: you’ll have no one to blame but yourself.

 

© 2014 John Francis McCarthy/Secret Goldfish Publishing House, LLC

 John McCarthy is an investigative reporter, artist and photojournalist based in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Please send questions and comments to: johnfmccarthy807@msn.com

Suicide By Capital Punishment

KANSAS CITY KILLER KILLS 3 IN KKK PLAY

YET ANOTHER POINTED VICTORY FOR THE NRA

THE VIEW FROM THE VIRGIN ISLANDS

By JOHN McCARTHY

THE MODERATE VOICE  

    I used to be a competitive tennis player.

     The thing about tennis – being an individual sport – is that you are not only battling your opponent – but your own head – meaning your own desire to succeed.      I found that if you let up – even for just one point – a snowball effect of losing points was often the result – making the Sisyphean task of rolling the boulder up the mountain almost impossible.

     Which brings us quite naturally to the hate crime in Kansas City.

     My sense is that America has just given up when it comes to gun violence. Yet we haven’t tanked just one point – but the whole game, set and match. Before we even step onto the court – we have already lost.

     The First Amendment allows all United States citizens to hate whomever they wish. That Frazier Glen Cross spent the first 73 years of his life hating people he considered different than him – then woke up one Sunday and decided to shoot three people in the upscale suburb of Overland Park – is almost incomprehensible.

     As a member of the Ku Klux Klan, Cross professed to hate Jews and miscegenists, but after he allegedly killed one 14-year-old boy, one 53-year-old woman and one 69-year-old man outside a Kansas Jewish community center – it was later learned that none of the three murdered were Jewish.

     In what might qualify as the first case of suicide by capital punishment, Cross had a right to bear arms and a grudge – law enforcement and the Southern Poverty Law Center had been keeping tabs on “aka Glenn Miller” but were hamstrung by the fact that he had never acted upon his racist rants.

     In America it is easier to pull out a gun – than a cigarette. The Second Amendment was created by our Founding Fathers for a young nation that did not yet have a police force or an army – the right to bear arms was an insurance policy against tyranny – in the form of the British crown.

     The real tragedy – besides the three innocent people whose lives were extinguished for no reason – is that the national discussion will not naturally shift to the 33 gun-related deaths that happen every day in the United States. If 2016 Presidential hopeful Sarah Palin could accuse President Obama of trying to “exploit” the tragedy of Sandy Hook to promote gun control – then the mini-massacre in Kansas is not likely to take her attention away from “Duck Dynasty.”

“Bullets cannot be recalled. They cannot be uninvented. But they can be taken out of the gun.” So said British novelist Martin Amis who finds it strange that America was founded by Europeans, but when it established itself as an independent country it didn’t understand that one of the rules of nationhood is: the police and the military get the guns: not the people.

     Even the Yakuza in Tokyo – the Japanese organized crime syndicate – don’t dare use a gun in that island nation of 127 million people. About as many people die from gun-related violence in Japan – on a yearly basis – as the number of people who die on a daily basis from gun violence in the United States.

     Since 1968, more Americans have died from gun violence than all those who have died in our country’s wars. There have been 1.4 million firearm deaths compared to 1.2 million in war. (The number of gun-related deaths includes suicides.)

     In football they used to tell us: “no pain, no gain.” In the Virgin Islands, they have a saying: “Who knows it feels it.” When it comes to gun violence in America – the question then becomes who is feeling the pain?

     Certainly not the gun manufacters who rack up $11.7 billion yearly ($993 million in profits) or the gun lobbies like the NRA that fight to ensure those manufacturers’ rights to make that big money. Make no mistake: the NRA is about the money.

     Perhaps another British writer, William Shakespeare, said it best when he said: “Why so large a cost, having so short a lease, does thou upon your fading mansion spend?”      We only have one life to live – and with non-peace officers carrying death in their hands in the form of pistols, rifles and machine guns – the life we have to live may be shorter than we had planned.

     You can foot fault in tennis and live to serve again – but a hand fault in illegitimate gun violence often brings a reckoning few bounce back from.

     The question is: when did we stop playing points in favor of making points?  

     Thanks to the NRA, guns may always rule the roost in America – but it is a hollow-point victory. 

 

 © 2014 John Francis McCarthy/Secret Goldfish Publishing House, LLC

 John McCarthy is an investigative reporter, artist and photojournalist based in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Please send questions and comments to: johnfmccarthy807@msn.com

 

The More Things Change

OLD SCHOOL IS THE NEW SCHOOL IN TV:

AN UNBLINKERED LOOK AT THE FUTURE:

THE VIEW FROM THE VIRGIN ISLANDS

 

By JOHN McCARTHY

MODERATE VOICE COLUMNIST 

 

    In the movie “Truth or Dare” we got a glimpse into the future of TV.

     Only we didn’t realize it when we were watching it in real time.

     “There’s nothing to say off camera,” Warren Beatty complains in the 1991 film. “Why would you say something if it’s off camera? What point is there existing?”

     Beatty’s irony seemed spot on then – but although he’s a gifted writer, director and actor – he couldn’t predict the future of television any more than he could figure out whether or not he should take the lead in a Quentin Tarantino flick (Kill Bill) – (he may have been right on that, though.)

     It seemed outrageous at the time to think that a celebrity – in this case Madonna  – would choose to exist only when the cameras are rolling. In a way it was contrived –

 but in another it was cinema verite – the good, the bad and the ugly of her on and off-stage life would be revealed for what it was.

     So as we are “Keeping Up With The Kardashians,” we realize that 23 years later – the Material Girl had a crystal ball into the boob tube – just like the Wicked Witch in “Wizard of Oz” trying to pick up Dorothy on early GPS.

     Andy Warhol is given credit for saying that: “in the future, everyone will be world-famous for 15 minutes.” But in 1968 who could predict the future? Not Bobby Kennedy.

     Just a year after “Truth or Dare,” reality TV was born as major network television tried to stay one step ahead of the writer’s strike. We have all been survivors of the launch of Paris Hilton’s career (not the one on videotape) – and the resuscitation of a rock star who by all counts should have died before Keith Richards – Ozzy Osbourne.

     I would not have know that the Kardashians’ show even existed were it not for a stay at my sister’s house a couple years ago. Eye candy might be the answer to the question why so many of us are fascinated by the ersatz dramas dreamed up by Kim, Kourtney, Khloe, Kendall and Kylie.

     But Honey Boo Boo and “Duck Dynasty” prove that you don’t have to be beautiful or rich to be successful in the modern-day ratings wars – but with a parallax view of the future have we reached the saturation point of reality TV? The good people among us hope so.

     If reality TV began when Madonna was at her apex, the real good stuff came about ten years after we were introduced to “Big Brother” and MTV’s “Real World” –

maybe as a reaction to what we are already feeling today – that as more and more desperate housewives get ready for their close-ups – hopefully more and more well-written series like “Lost,” “The Sopranos,” “The Wire,” “Deadwood,” “House, M.D.” and “Nurse Jackie” are in the works.

     In the entertainment business, it used to be the ultimate put-down to say that a film was shot “in real time.” They were the kind of movies that made you regret spending two hours of your life stuck in a movie theater.

     Let’s hope that we have reached the point of no return when it comes to America idolizing shows that allow you to vicariously dance with the stars or show that you have talent – even though when the show’s over the majority of the contestants are still poor and not famous. Anybody can upload to YouTube a bear falling out of a tree onto a trampoline – but how many times do you want to “just press play” and watch that?

     Madonna, at the height of her career following “Truth or Dare” released a coffee table book of herself with other women in various states of undress in “Erotica” – an electric, vibrant and sometimes shocking personality reduced to an age-old still life just didn’t fly with the public – and her career stalled. Warhol, at the apogee of his fine art career turned to films and showed us where the future really lies with reality TV.

     The eight hours of a moving pictures of a static building in “Empire” demonstrates where this is all going. Do you have the patience to wait several hours for the lights to go on at the Empire State Building in New York City? (Andy also said that his movies are better talked about than actually seen.)

     As we sit riveted to our iPhones and tablets while pretending to watch what’s on TV, maybe that’s all we are doing – keeping one eye out – or an ear, so that when someone asks us about it at the office the next day we can say: “Yeah, I saw that. It was cool.” When we all know it wasn’t.

   Everyone remembers where they were when Tony Soprano blinked off on the TV screen. Our JFK moments can now happen in riveting television dramas. But they have to be good ones, not collages of sound bites that are cobbled together by editors in a production booth.

     Warhol’s artworks covered up the warts and moles of the celebrities we all know and love. His pancake makeup silkscreens told us that Leo Castelli had good bone structure – and Liza Minelli, Elizabeth Taylor and Marilyn were still relevant. But his “screen tests” revealed when Dennis Hopper got nervous or Bob Dylan was bored. Dan Rather said “the camera never blinks.”

     As we get closer and closer to a type of TV that Andy invented, where the filmmaker simply turns on the camera and walks away – what will that reveal about us as human beings?

     Don’t blink or you’ll miss it.

     Just like The Sopranos ending.

 

 

© 2014 John Francis McCarthy/Secret Goldfish Publishing House, LLC

 

John McCarthy is an investigative reporter, artist and photojournalist based in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Please send questions and comments to: johnfmccarthy807@msn.com

 

 

 

The Boy Who Would Be Lama: Beijing Bans Buddhism’s Heir Apparent

IN CHINA “DL” STANDS FOR MORE THAN “DISABLED LIST”:

AMBER ALERT IS 20 YEARS OLD ON THE PANCHEN LAMA:

THE VIEW FROM THE VIRGIN ISLANDS

 

By JOHN McCARTHY

MODERATE VOICE COLUMNIST

 

     Ever wonder why you see those “Free Tibet” bumper stickers on peoples’ cars?

     We have a few of them here – in St. Croix, the U.S. Virgin Islands – where I live.

     For Liberals it used to be “End Apartheid” – a bumper sticker that you can still see on Danny Glover’s fridge in the movie “Lethal Weapon.”

     But in the year of Nelson Mandela’s death – Apartheid is dead but the reason to “Free Tibet” is not.

     One reason Tibet deserves to be a free and independent nation – free and apart from a China that controls it – is that it is the historical home of the Dalai Lama. A Dalai Lama who currently is forced to live in exile in northern India – and who has chosen his rightful successor – but now HE can’t be found – he was disppeared from Tibet nearly twenty years ago – and was last seen in the hands of the Chinese.

     How could that possibly be? You might ask.

     Well, six Nobel Laureates and four hundred celebrities can’t be wrong.

     Or can they be?

     A little background might help. The Dalai Lama is: the Buddhist spiritual leader from Tibet. More specifically – to about 20 million Buddhists – he is the “Pope” of their religion. They believe that he is the living reincarnation of the first Buddha, born Siddhartha Gautama.

     Great Wall of China. So where’s the problem?

     The problem is: The Dalai Lama (which means “High Priest” or literally “ocean guru” in Mongolian) chose his legitimate successor – and, uh, well – the Chinese government “vanished” him three days later.

     Unbelievable you say.

     Well, that was 1995 – when the once and future Dalai was just six years old – nineteen years later nothing has changed. Or nearly nothing. At least as far as we know.

     Because when it comes to “transparency,” the Chinese government is always on high smog toxic alert.

     What do you mean by “nothing?” Well, you might say: “nothing” if you feel that the 376 million people worldwide who practice Buddhism don’t add up. It is only about one-third the size of the Holy Roman Catholic Church. And the number of Buddhists who follow Tenzin Gyatso, the 14^th Dalai Lama – could fit inside the New York City metropolitan area.

     So we’re NOT talking about a lot of religious people here – only about 20 million – give or take a few.

     But what if, prior to Pope Francis of Argentina succeeding Pope Benedict of Germany, the government of Italy decided to kidnap Jorge Mario Bergoglio from St. Peter’s Basilica inside Vatican City – and not only kidnap him and make him disappear – but also Jorge and all of his immediate Bergoglio family members?

     Sounds like something out of “The Sopranos.” Or “The Gotti Files.” And that’s exactly the scenario the 79-year-old Dalai Lama (born Tenzin Gyatso) finds himself in today.

     If you have seen the brilliant documentary “10 Questions for The Dalai Lama,” then you have a better understanding of what happened to six-year-old Gedhun Choekyi Nyima – a person human rights experts used to call “the world’s youngest political prisoner” – only the movie suggests that neither he – nor his relatives – are still with us.

     So they ended up like that guy who accidentally bumped his car into John Gotti’s school-age son in Howard Beach, Queens – and then disappeared in a van four months later – never to be heard from – or seen – again.

     If you ask the Chinese government, as the United Nations Council on Human Rights did in 2007 – Beijing said that the then 12-year-old Panchen Lama –as the successor to the Dalai Lama is known – was a healthy and growing boy.

     “Gedhun Choekyi Nyima is a perfectly ordinary Tibetan boy, in an excellent state of health, leading a normal, happy life and receiving a good education and cultural upbringing. He is currently in upper secondary school, he measures 165 cm in height and is easy-going by nature. He studies hard and his school results are very good. He likes Chinese traditional culture and has recently taken up calligraphy. His parents are both State employees, and his brothers and sisters are either already working or at university. The allegation that he disappeared together with his parents and that his whereabouts remain unknown is simply not true.”

     The part about his brothers and sisters “EITHER WORKING OR AT UNIVERSITY” must be one of those lost in translation bits – because it reads ominously today as if what we suspect to be true – is true.

     Seven years later – when “the boy” should be at least twenty-five years old – if he is still alive at all imprisoned somewhere – there is simply no credible report! Imagine if Italy had done the same thing with Pope Francis – as loveable and cuddly as the 77-year-old Pontiff is now – can you imagine the uproar? It might have caused even Mussolini to turn over in his grave – and most certainly would have triggered a brief World War III – with Rome bearing the brunt of a few Tomahawk missles.

     Instead, because it is China – where the record on Human Rights – is, shall we say “compromised” at best – no one says nothin’ at all – and gets away with it! In fact, everyone right now is talking about the Olympics in Russia, another place that is a total stranger to the Rule of Law.

     To make matters worse, the Chinese government, citing Emporer Qing from 1735 (when a Dalai Lama was once chosen by a lottery drawing the names written on barley leaves from a golden urn) installed their own Panchen Lama six months after they made the legitimate one disappear from Tibet – and his name is Gyaincain Norbu.

     Some magic trick. So as it officially stands – who will be the next Dalai Lama is officially in “dispute.” Like what happened in Tiananmen Square that the Chinese people can’t read about because the government has whited out most of the Internet there.

     This “dispute” was executed by the Chinese government in lands they control near the Himalaya Mountains – where they allegedly kidhapped Gedhum Choekyi Nyima from Tibet – along with him and every living immediate family member.

     Now Buddhists are known to be “Zen” in the face of difficult times – and the Dalai Lama himself  – who is 78 years old – has said that there might not ever be another Ocean Guru of Buddhism – and if there is – it might even be a woman this time – but it will definitely not be someone “reborn” in a country controlled by the Chinese, he insists.

     That means Tibet – the homeland of the current Dalai Lama and every “enlightened one” since Buddhism began (except the 3^rd Dalai Lama who was born in Mongolia) – is out. Places inside the Tibetan cultural beltway; however – India, Nepal and Bhutan – are in. That is – unless we can “free Tibet” – which seems unlikely at this point.

     So the next time you see a “Free Tibet” bumper sticker on a car in front of you, don’t allow your karma to run over my dogma.

     Or something like that – just remember that China has re-written the book on Human Rights when it comes to the Dalai Lama and Tibet.

     Now and Zen, you’ll be right.

 

© 2014 Copyright John McCarthy/Secret Goldfish Publishing House, LLC/Kindle @ Amazon

 

Are The Fumes From The Worm’s Vodka Worse Than The Nuclear Radiation Leaking in Pyongyang?

THE OFFENSIVE DMZ OF DENNIS RODMAN’S MIND:

MINING THE AMERICAN DREAM IN NORTH KOREA:

THE VIEW FROM THE VIRGIN ISLANDS

By John F. McCarthy

Moderate Voice Columnist

 

Now that we know Dennis Rodman is NOT a traitor (even though Mike Tyson said he was) – and is willing to take Kenneth Bao’s place in a North Korean jail cell … 

Still, there are the niggling matters of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) signed by President Obama in 2010 as Executive Order 13551 and United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1718 of 2006 and 2094 of 2013, but …

Mr. Rodman can always claim that he was blind-sided when the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence (TFI) knocks at his door in rehab in New Jersey.

Because “The Worm” had a life experience similar to that of the NFL’s Michael Oher of the movie “The Blind Side.”

Oher was born the year Dennis Keith Rodman was drafted into the NBA – 1986. And though you are more familiar with Oher’s touching rags to riches story – where an upper-class white family – “raised” an adult black professional athlete prospect while he goes to college – you still don’t know Michael Oher’s name – but you do know Dennis Rodman’s.

So how “The Worm” got the Tiannamen Square Sawed Off Shotgun Tip-Off Tour of North Korea – while Mr. Oher got the Tinsel Town Major Motion Picture Deal – with Sandra Bullock – might be a question better put to Mr. Rodman’s agent.

Because the story arc of Dennis the Menace’s life was far more precipitous – he was sweeping out Dallas Fort Worth International Airport for a living, when he had a tremendous Alien-like growth spurt – growing fully thirteen inches in one – his nineteenth – summer.

His two sisters were All-American college basketball players – so when the Rodman family genes finally kicked in with their male progeny – going from 5’6” to 6’7” – it didn’t take long for he and his folks to realize that this was his Jed Clampett moment. Their son was now nearly as tall as an oil derrick – he was the “bubbling crude” that Jed found at the end of a gun – and they seized the day and enlisted him in the Beverly Hills of community colleges in Texas – Cooke County.

But our Mr. Rodman had trouble coping with the stresses of college life – and flunked out after only one semester because he couldn’t make the grade. A lesser man might have quit there, but “The Worm” didn’t. When the Byrnes – a white family in Southeastern Oklahoma “adopted” Rodman – it was the turning point that allowed him to metamorphose out of his shy introverted cocoon – he had no piercings or “ink” then.

By the time the Detroit Pistons drafted him out of his second college stint – they already had a superstar (Isiah Thomas) – a nickname “The Bad Boys” – and a winning tradition. But new coach Chuck Daley saw the potential in this gangly, goofy-looking, wide-eyed kid from New Jersey. He himself had never coached before in the pro game – but he was a legend in Pennsylvania high school basketball circles – and stifling defense was his secret weapon.

Dennis could do nothing other than defend (maybe rebound a little) – he couldn’t shoot an orange round ball into an metal rim and white net to save his life – but he was joining a team that was already almost bigger than his ego would grow to – with guys like: Bill Laimbeer, Rick Mahorn, Vinny “The Microwave” Johnson, Adrian Dantley, John Salley and Joe Dumars. They were more sharp elbows – and black and blue hard knocks – and hardly-seen socks – than had ever been seen before in the NBA – but those were welcome sights to the people who had been weaned on Gordie Howe’s style in Hockeytown.

To score against those Detroit Pistons – you had to pay a physical price – Daley was big on D-fense – and the frisky “Worm” was about to glow in his “new” strategy. After all, Dennis Rodman was not a worm at all; he had long arms (what they call “wingspan” in the NBA – and quick feet – perfect for this new “ball-denial” style of pro defense. But one inchworm step forward, two Amazon steps backward …. In his first NBA year, our Dennis allowed the Boston Celtics to win a crucial Eastern Conference championship elimination game in the final seconds – because he began celebrating too early – abandoning his vigilant defensive stance prematurely. Even then he was kind of flighty – and high strung.

It took years for the “Bad Boys” to finally unseat Larry Bird, Kevin McHale, Robert Parish, Danny Ainge and Dennis Johnson as Eastern Conference Champions in the NBA. When they finally did – it was an heroic accomplishment – one worthy of someone who went from $2 an hour to $2 million a year.

The Worm’s Detroit Pistons won back-to-back NBA Championships – earned by holding off yet another upstart (also cut from his high school basketball team) named Michael Jordan – who played for the Chicago Bulls and seriously challenged Detroit’s basketball ascendency – nearly keeping them from getting airborne. “The Jordan Rules” were a complicated set of trap defenses – designed by Daley to keep Michael Jordan from dominating the game – and ruining the Pistons’ chances – but all “The Jordan Rules” ever were – was to simply put Dennis Rodman on Michael Jordan – guarding arguably the greatest player who ever played the game.

After the Championships, Success, and maybe other elegizing substances besides euphoria, informed “The Worm” that maybe it would be a good idea to bring a loaded shotgun to “work” at the Pontiac Silverdome one day – where the Pistons used to play and practice. Oh our Dennis was different – even then.

When Michael finally overcame “The Jordan Rules,” and started winning championships on his own – Rodman figured, if you can’t beat ’em, join ’em – and soon “The Worm” turned good for MJ, Scottie Pippen and the Chicago Bulls – helping them eventually amass three of their six NBA Championships (after first helping Detroit win two). From sweeping out airport lobbies for minimum wage – to NBA superstardom – is a stretch maybe only Dennis Rodman himself has ever accomplished in modern-day America.

He was on five NBA Championship teams – Jordan was on six. Dennis got to date Madonna and marry Carmen Electra; he got to wear a white wedding dress – but he was a success in the NBA despite his modest offensive abilities – because HE TRIED REAL DAMN HARD – he had an intense work ethic on the court – perhaps second to none. It was that superhuman work ethic that “turned” him from DFW airport broom meister, to student athlete and NAIA All-American to NBA Defensive Player of The Year (twice) – and maybe – just maybe – one of the (G)reatest NBA defensive Players (O)f (A)ll (T)ime. (Or G.O.A.T.’s, as Jerry Rice likes to put it).

Which makes me wonder, what was Kim Jong-il’s work ethic like? And how would one know if it were a particularly good year for the “Supreme Leader” of North Korea? Did he kill more rivals one year as opposed to others? Build more concentration camps with slave labor? Separate more families in gulag-prisons? Stuffed more imported Maine lobster down his gullet one year while his beloved people starved to death?

Kim Jong-un, the son, has inherited his dictator father’s love of the game of NBA Basketball and probably other Jong-il Family trusted pastimes (like over-eating) and “taking out the garbage” (with the sudden, but not unexpected death of trusted advisor Gen. Jang Song-thaek last year.)

As U2’s Bono once musically asked about old age pensioners getting blown to bits during military parades in terrorist attacks in Northern Ireland – steadying the course to an end of Sinn Fein and “The Troubles” there: “Where’s the glory in that?”

Now that Dennis Rodman has gone on Offense – bringing Kenny Anderson, Cliff Robertson, Vin Baker, Craig Hodges, Doug Christie and Charles D. Smith and what wire service reports called “four street ballers” on a goodwill games tour of Pyongyang City last week – we can see that it is not his strong suit.

Dennis got drunk, sang “Happy Birthday To You” to Baby Kim – in a kind of Their Satanic Majesties Request-Cinderella parallel universe transvestite transgender upside down cake version of Marilyn Monroe & JFK, and a tipsy Worm later had a meltdown when a CNN anchor asked him about an American missionary who has been held captive by North Korea for fourteen months.

I guess Mr. Rodman got paid handsomely for HIS troubles? (Which might say more about the State of the American Dream than it does about Dennis.) But can “The Worm” ever get drunk enough to forget that Pyongyang Train, running up and down North Korea with just one chain-smoking NBA fan on board – death staring him square in the face – the soon-to-be late fearless leader of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea – gorging himself on champagne and caviar – trying to fill an existential hollowness that comes with making Hitlerian decisions regarding human beings in forced labor camps?

I keep reminding myself – as a fan of the National Basketball Association – that there’s a lot of glory in Dennis Rodman.

But “The Worm” has turned now – and I’m left with one nagging question: “Where’s the glory in that?”

 

© Copyright 2014 Secret Goldfish Publishing House/John Francis McCarthy  

Now Is The Time 4 All Good Men 2 Jump 2 Conclusions

LOST IN THE GOLDEN TRIANGLE – RATHER THAN BERMUDA.

THE CASE IS MADE FOR PROFILING PILOTS OVERSEAS.

THE VIEW FROM THE VIRGIN ISLANDS.

 

By John McCarthy

Moderate Voice Columnist

 

     It’s surreal enough to be the plot of a major TV series.

     In fact it already was – “Lost” on ABC – except even scarier than giant polar bears and smoke monsters – are pilots with extreme views bent on total destruction.

     The flight in the TV series was scheduled for 17 hours – Sydney to LA; the flying time of Malaysian Airlines’ Flight 370 was scheduled for about half that – going from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing.

     What happened along the way of that aborted flight path has been the subject of much speculation about terrorism and suicide since the ill-fated Asia-based jetliner went missing nine days ago.

     CBS News and The Times of India call “pilot suicide” a taboo subject – but it is one that is likely to be more talked about in the coming days, weeks and months as the vanished Boeing 777 continues to dominate the 24-hour news cycle.

     “You cannot quite yet rule out everything because we don’t have the physical evidence we need to come to that conclusion,” said Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI) on CBS’ Face The Nation, meaning that he felt no indication means the airplane is “at the bottom of the Indian Ocean.”

     If a “preponderance of evidence” could lead to criminal charges filed against a sitting American president – it only makes sense that a complete lack of evidence could also lead someone to reach a foregone conclusion in a case such as this.

     However, I feel quite the opposite. If Rep. Peter King (R-NY) is right and “the plane was last seen heading towards Pakistan.” And if we grant that the disappeared flight was commandeered with the intentions of terrorism, then what is the worst possible scenario?

     That the plane – with 239 hostages aboard needing food and drink for nine days – has safely landed in an obscure South Pacific outpost – to be used “later” as a “flying bomb” just as the two planes that knocked out the World Trade Center’s Twin Towers were used.

     No one is writing about it online yet, but the Petronas Twin Towers – featured in the movie “Entrapment” with Sean Connery and Catherine Zeta-Jones – is an obvious target for someone looking to make their bones via terrorism. Its 88 floors are the centerpiece of Malaysia’s futuristic Kuala Lumpur skyline – at 1,483 feet, it used to be one of the tallest structures in the world.

     As Slate online reported, there are 634 such landing sites within the flying range of Malaysian Airlines Flight 370 – including some in the middle of the Indian Ocean such as: The Cocos Islands (runway length 8,009 feet); Diego Garcia Naval Support Facility (runway length 12,003 feet); Gan International Airport (runway length 8,694 feet) and the appropriately named “Mal” (meaning “bad” in French) International Airport (runway length 10,499 feet).

     If Malaysian Airlines Flight 370 was heading west, it could have stopped off at any one of these remote atolls to refuel for use at a later time while hiding at a remote island airstrip that would have to be at least 5,000 feet long – but wouldn’t necessarily have to be paved (it could be hard-packed dirt) – experts say it could have even landed on a freeway. If it was heading northwest towards Pakistan, as Rep. King stated then it would have had to have cleared heavily-monitored airspace near U.S. Armed Forces in Afghanistan.

     And if Rep. Rogers is correct, and Malaysian Airlines Flight 370 was on a suicide mission with 53-year-old Captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah and 27-year-old Fariq Abdul Hamid as the masters of disaster – then there is a corollary with the crashes of Egypt Air Flight 990 (LA to Cairo) on October 31, 1999 and SilkAir Flight 185 (Jakarta to Singapore) on December 19, 1997.

    The common denominator on all of these doomed flights – if Captain Shah (who is seen on Facebook wearing a “Democracy Is Dead” t-shirt and has links to the Malaysian terrorist group that bombed a Bali bar popular with Australians in 2002) – is likely to add fuel to the fire for Islamophobes everywhere – and lead to talk about mandatory psychological profiling of pilots.

    The Co-Pilot Hamid was known as a “Cockpit Romeo” for allegedly inviting two ladies in the past to join him in that restricted area for the duration of an entire flight – all of which begs the question: if the pilots do not own the airplanes – how is it that they can manually turn off transponders and other safety technology – when the reasons not to give them such leeway are obvious now?

     The news 10 days in was that the hijacked plane was flown to the Taliban – if it was – it is unlikely that the coddled, confused Malaysian government officials will be ready for their returning missal if and when it does come back.

     The good news is that the number of mechanically-caused commercial airline disasters have virtually been engineered out of existence.

     Now the commercial airline industry has to devise a way to make the friendly skies freer of pilot errors – including suicide.

     It may be too late to save the people aboard the missing airplane on its departure..

     But it is not too late to prevent a future disaster caused  by the same plane as an arrival.

 

© 2014 John Francis McCarthy/Secret Goldfish Publishing House, LLC

 

John McCarthy is an investigative reporter, artist and photojournalist based in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Please send questions and comments to: johnfmccarthy807@msn.com

 

 

A War Of Words Doesn’t Have To Involve Fighting

A Global Crossing of Wildly Popular World Leaders.

The Rock Star Pope Greets The Superman President.

The View From The Virgin Islands

By John McCarthy

Moderate Voice Columnist

 

     President Obama met with Pope Francis a few days before April Fool’s Day in Rome. 

     That’s when I learned that the phrase “conscientious objection” no longer means what we thought it means.

      The President sought to characterize the meeting as one between common allies, but the Vatican stressed the little differences, including what it called every person’s right to “religious freedom, life and conscientious objection.” 

     To be fair, there was innuendo on each side because Mr. Obama said there was no talk of “social schisms” in the 52-minute meeting in Vatican City – schism being a word that has been used historically to describe breakaway sects of all Protestant denominations from the Roman Catholic Church. 

     So there was the subtlety of diplomatic word play at work, and even the New York Times was left asking whether the Pope’s scribes meant for “conscientious objection” to refer to “an allusion to the contraception provision” of the Affordable Care Act?

      And although I don’t have a direct line to Italy as a non-excommunicated Catholic, indeed they did mean it to mean that – trust me. I thought it was a very clever use of the phrase “conscientious objection” which is a term that has been in use since World War I to describe people who wish to opt out of combat service on moral grounds.

      The United Nations Commission on Human Rights says “conscientious objectors” are “persons performing military service [who have] the right to have conscientious objections to military service.”

      Muhammad Ali is one of the most famous American conscientious objectors from the Vietnam War era. I remember driving in a car to St. Michael’s Catholic School on Monday, March 8, 1971 and my cousin Delmar asking me who I thought would win “The Fight of The Century.” I said: “Muhammad Ali.” He said: “But he was a draft dodger.” 

     So even in a discussion about boxing, questions and answers can quickly turn political – leaving us all to wonder if legitimate discourse is dead – we certainly hope not. 

     For to equate “conscientious objection” – a phrase that has been used internationally for nearly 100 years to refer to people who choose not to fight in wars – with people who seek to impose their religious dogma on all of us – strikes me as richly disingenuous.

   It is a fair question to ask whether or not those who do not believe in allowing people to have access to contraception – have the right to impose that will on others – and also whether it is ethical to couch that issue as one of simply “opting out.” 

     I say it is not merely an issue of a hospital being able to “opt out” of supplying contraception to patients, because if administrations were able pick and choose what they will offer – it would set up a two-tier system of “believers” and “non-believers” in parochial medical facilities nationwide. Who do you think would get the best service under such a system? What tier would you want to be in? 

     What I thought was lacking from the rock star Pope – whom I like and admire as much as everyone from Rolling Stone to the Jerusalem Post seems to for his outreach to the poor – was a sense of the Holy Father wanting to bring everyone on board. I couldn’t help but wonder how someone who is infallible on church matters could make such an obvious team spirit faux pas? I read that he was a bouncer; maybe he never played team sports? 

     Although President Obama said kind things about Ronald Reagan in his stump speeches in 2008 and 2012, it is obvious from his political agenda that he understands that “trickle-down theory” and “voodoo economics” are the same thing – and it doesn’t work no matter what you call it or how many failed Republican presidential candidates say that it will work. But when the Pope said the same thing he was branded a “Marxist” by Rush Limbaugh. 

     To me, Barack Hussein Obama and Jorge Mario Bergoglio are world-beloved spiritual soul mates and I wish that the Pope had tried to cozy up a little more with the Leader of the Free World in their desk-side chat. A full-on, like-minded bromance would have been nice – since each is already spoken for when it comes to the possibility of a same sex wedding. I’m left cold with the belief that the church must no longer be crusading for new membership. 

     Maybe there’s still time for their courtship to blossom – or have the bean counters at the Vatican steriley calculated that Mr. Obama will see eye to eye with them when a camel passes through eye of a needle? I still say that it never hurts to have one more enthusiastic supporter in your camp. 

     Since that is not an issue of church doctrine, Pope Francis can be wrong. 

     And I can be right.

Copyright 2014 Secret Goldfish Publishing House, LCC/Kindle @ Amazon

 

Modern Media Is A Game Of Duck-Duck-Goose

WHEN YOU DIVIDE 30 ROCK BY 15 MINUTES OF FAME – WHAT DO YOU GET? (THE CALL OF THE WILD IS AN AD REVENUE SHELL GAME OF DUCK, DUCK GOOSE) THE VIEW FROM THE VIRGIN ISLANDS

By John F. McCarthy Moderate Voice Columist

All the world’s a stage, but the modern American media business is but a shill game. So Tina Dupuy is right to make a distinction between Free Speech and Free Enterprise. The two things aren’t related as it turns out (not even kissin’ cousins if you’re watching “Duck Dynasty” or “Honey Boo Boo.”) The reason no one defends Alec Baldwin, Martin Bashir and Phil Robertson on Free Speech is because the Free Market sorts all that out on its own. Advertising agencies pay big bucks for demographic studies of television audiences that let them know whether someone who is watching “The Martin Bashir Show” is more likely to gargle with Scope or Listerine. Demographic studies allow companies to make more efficient use of their precious advertising dollars by scientifically pairing a product with a select “target” audience. The idea: to maximize the chances that someone watching the show will actually go out and buy their product once the show is over. Statistics like age, sex, marital status and household income provide ad agencies’ media buyers with the information they need to more accurately predict which shows companies should “bet on” to sell more products. If you make squawking duck whistles in Louisiana – and aren’t fond of shaving implements – have we ever got a show fer you – yee ha! Get ‘er done! The usual suspects: Alec, Martin and Phil were thrilled when MSNBC and A&E respectively – asked them to host shows on their networks. At that time, with apologies to Sally Field and The Academy, the networks “really, really liked them!” Or so they thought. (It is what their agents told them then.) But really, really, truth be told, what the networks really wanted from that fearsome threesome was ratings – because the higher the ratings – the more the networks can charge for the shows (A)lec, (M)artin and (P)hil were/are on. Only, sometimes these hosts, well, ur – get a little full of themselves – and go on homophobic gay bashing jaunts (as in the cases of Alec and Phil) – or attempt to give 2016 Republican Presidential candidates lessons in historic slave punishments – as in the case of Martin. And that’s not what they were hired to do. What they were hired to do was to get increasingly more audience share for their respective time slots. Nothing more.

The fact that Phil kept his job (because his A&E show is highly rated) proves the point. Get ‘er done, as Larry, The Cable Guy, now The purple Prilesec OTC Guy, used to say. When A-M-P started yelling “fire” in a crowded movie theaters nationwide, network execs ran screaming for the exits. It might take “brass balls to sell real estate,” as Alec famously said in the movie “Glengarry Glen Ross,” but ShamWow! balls might have gotten her done just as efficiently for MSNBC. After all, it’s all about branding. Not all about them. The stars, that is. Only the stars’ egos don’t always inform them thus and so. So when the “Hunt for the Red October” star’s toxicity level soared after TMZ started videotaping Alec Argument gay bashing paparazzi nearly every night live on tape – Mr. Baldwin went the way of Mr. Bashir, before he did. Bye, bye Bashir. Bet you don’t cry for him now, Al-ec-ti-no. As Ms. Dupuy writes: “Corporations should not have to sponsor people who say things [that] will hurt their brand.” And so they don’t – but in fact – they never have. Case in point: Andy Warhol and the Campbell’s Soup Company. Arguably, nobody did more (in terms of free advertising) for a product (with as little effort and as much fanfare) as Drella did for the Campbell’s Soup Company with his then-shocking consumme can paintings in 1962. The complete set of 32 was ceded to the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) for a round $100 million – an individual Campbell’s Soup Can painting sold for $11.8 million in 2006. But three years after Warhol’s death, when the paintings were still reasonably-priced (by corporate-buying standards,) the Campbell’s Soup Company CEO was asked point blank if the company had ever broken down and bought one of the paintings to display in their Camden, New Jersey world headquarters. Campbell’s just said “no.” The company did not want to “officially” marry Warhol’s image with their own. So there you have it. “The more things change, the more they stay the same,” as Yogi Berra famously said. The game has never changed, whether it is soap powder and hair tonic advertised on “Truth or Consequences” – or Hot Pockets & camouflage gatling guns advertised on “Duck Dynasty” – it’s just a shill game. Under which “rock” is the celebrity hiding? Go ahead, pick one. Duck, duck, goose.

© Copyright 2014 Secret Goldfish Publishing House/John Francis McCarthy